Fair
Use Disclaimer
housingissues.org
is a nonprofit,
noncommercial website that, at times, may contain copyrighted material
that have not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. It makes such material available in its efforts to advance the
understanding of poverty and low income distressed neighborhoods in
hopes of helping to find solutions for those problems. It believes that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Persons wishing to
use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of their own that
go beyond 'fair use' must first obtain permission from the copyright
owner.
|
October 2002 - Florida Bar Journal -
Click
Here to view original article
"Here Comes the Money":
A Subcontractor's and Material Supplier's
Guide to Perfecting Construction Lien and Bond Rights Under Florida Law
by Daniel R. Vega
Your brother runs a small tile installation company. He calls you
complaining that he has not been paid on a job where he installed
$15,000 worth of tiles for a general contractor. He wants to know what
he can do. Your brother desperately needs the cash to pay off the tile
manufacturer that extended credit for the tiles and to pay his
laborer's wages. Because he previously installed tiles for that same
general contractor on previous jobs and was always timely paid, the
contractor's oral payment reassurances on this project were enough for
your brother. Now, one month after the work has been completed and
three months after the work was started, the general contractor is
nowhere to be found and your brother remains unpaid. What do you tell
him?
Even though it may be too late for your brother to perfect his
construction lien and/or bond rights under Florida law, next time,
compliance with some very basic steps prior to or during the time he is
on the job will prevent a similar result. Indeed, if the final work
product is not questioned, he should be paid in full, and you should be
able to recover your attorneys' fees and costs in representing him.
This article sets forth the process to ensure that your brother is paid.
Generally, Florida law provides that a subcontractor or material
supplier ("lienor") who provides labor, work, or materials for the
improvement of private real property located within Florida has a lien
on that property for the value of the materials, labor, or work
provided.1 The purpose of the Florida Construction Lien Law "is to
protect those who have provided labor and materials for the improvement
of real property."2
Private property owners concerned about clouds on title can exempt
their property from liens by securing a lien bond in anticipation of
construction.3 The lien bond substitutes for the property as security
for the payment of a potential lienor.4 If the project is bonded, the
lienor has a claim against the bond for the value of the work and/or
the materials provided to improve the property. Owners can also
transfer liens to bonds as they see fit after a lien is recorded.5
Public property, on the other hand, is exempt from liens.6 Accordingly,
Florida law requires that every public job be bonded.7 However, because
Florida construction lien and bond law abrogate the common law of
contracts, courts strictly construe the corresponding statutory
provisions.8
Perfecting Claim of Lien on Nonbonded Project
A lienor who is not in contractual "privity"9 with the owner must
satisfy certain conditions precedent to perfect its right to a
construction lien.10 First, the lienor must serve the owner with a
"notice to owner."11 The service of the notice to owner does not mean
that litigation will ensue or that the lienor will not be paid. The
purpose of the notice to owner is to apprise the owner of the lienor's
presence on the job so that the owner can protect itself from the
possibility of paying over to its contractor monies which ought to go
to an unpaid potential lienor who has previously provided work, labor,
and/or materials.12 In other words, the owner can prevent paying twice
for a lienor's work by verifying pursuant to a lien waiver (partial or
final) that money paid to the contractor ends up paid to the lienor
providing notice. The lienor must serve13 a notice to owner within the
earlier of 45 days of first materials delivered to the project or work
performed on the project or before final payment is made by the owner
in reliance on the final contractor's affidavit.14
The notice to owner must be sent in the form provided by
�713.06(2)(c). A deviation from the statutory form risks losing
the lienor's rights entirely.15 If the lienor is not in privity with
the general contractor, it must also serve the contractor with the
notice to owner.16 The notice to owner should also be served on any
lender identified in the notice of commencement17 because the lender
may be obligated to seek lien waivers from lienors as progress payments
are made.18
A lienor who fails to recover a timely payment and who has complied
with its notice to owner requirements may lien the owner's property to
obtain payment. To do so the lienor must record a claim of lien in the
public records of the county where the property is located within 90
days of the final furnishing of materials, labor, or work or at any
time during performance.19 It is safest to calculate this 90-day period
as running from the date of substantial completion of the work.20
Florida courts apply the "substantial completion" test to determine
when the 90-day period begins to run. In applying this test, the courts
consider the following factors:
- Whether the work was done in good faith;
- Whether the work was done within a reasonable time and in
pursuance of the contract requirements; and
- Whether the work was really necessary for a finished job.21
These tests for determining the date of last performance generally do
not apply to a material supplier who, in most cases, can establish with
certainty the date it last delivered materials to the project based on
executed delivery tickets or receipts. However, they will certainly
apply to a subcontractor who is providing continuous service to the
project. A 1998 amendment to Florida's Construction Lien Law prohibits
the use of the date the certificate of occupancy or certificate of
substantial completion are issued as the date of last furnishing labor
and/or materials.22 This directive renders the determination of the
last date of performance, in most cases, a factual issue to be decided
at trial.
The claim of lien must also be in substantially the same form as that
provided in �713.08(3). If the lien is not in compliance with the
statutory form, the lienor risks losing its rights entirely.23 To
effectuate the recording of the claim of lien, the lien must be
prepared and notarized by the lienor and then taken to the clerk of
court in the county of the property's location where it is recorded in
the public records for a nominal fee.
Following recording, the claim of lien should be promptly served by
certified mail, return receipt requested, on all of the applicable
parties listed in the notice of commencement. If not timely served, "to
the extent that the failure or delay is shown to have been prejudicial
to any person entitled to rely on the service," the lien may be void.24
A word of caution: Even if an owner fails to record a notice of
commencement, the lien should nevertheless be served on the owner at
any available address.25
After the lien has been recorded, the lienor must commence a court
action to foreclose the lien and recover for the work performed within
one year from the date the lien is recorded.26 An untimely action bars
foreclosure of the lien but not other potential remedies against the
contractor or the owner, such as quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, or
breach of contract claims. Furthermore, when a lienor files an action
to foreclose a construction lien, it should always record and serve a
lis pendens. Doing so prevents the owner from transferring title to a
buyer without notice of the lien after the one-year lien period
expires.27 The prevailing party on the lien action is entitled to an
award of attorneys' fees and costs,28 and a likely award of prejudgment
interest as well.29
Owner's Rights Against a Lien
Under �713.22, an owner may shorten the normal one-year statute of
limitations for filing an action on a construction lien by recording a
notice of contest of lien with the clerk of court in the county where
the lien is recorded.30 After recording this notice, the clerk's office
will mail a copy to the lienor informing it that suit to enforce the
lien must be instituted within 60 days of the service.31 Any lien not
sued upon within this 60-day time period is extinguished.32
Another way the owner can challenge a lien is pursuant to the
"fraudulent lien statute."33 Section 713.31 provides that willfully
exaggerated liens or liens prepared in a grossly negligent manner may
be deemed fraudulent and unenforceable.34 The fraudulent lienor may
also be liable to the owner for damages, costs, and attorneys' fees,
and is potentially guilty of a third-degree felony.35 To avoid a
fraudulent lien defense or, even worse, a counterclaim, a lienor should
ensure that its claim of lien is recorded timely, only includes the
actual amount due for the materials and/or work provided (i.e. , liens
are not allowed to include interest, costs, or attorneys' fees) and
should be prepared in good faith with due care and support from the
contract, change orders, and financial records.36
Finally, although a lienor's lien rights may not be waived in advance,
lien rights may be waived to the extent a lienor provides and is paid
for its labor, services, or materials on the project.37 Lien waivers
are usually conditioned on the payment of money due for the labor,
services, or materials furnished.38 Accordingly, the contractor and/or
the construction loan lender, on behalf of the sophisticated owner,
will undoubtedly require written lien waivers from all lienors to the
extent they are paid for work done or materials provided.39
Unconditional Private Payment Bonds��713.23
When an owner does not want construction liens to be recorded against a
particular property, it may require that the general contractor post an
unconditional (traditional) private payment bond prior to construction.
Such a bond stands as substitute security for the payment of lienors.40
Unlike a conditional payment bond (see discussion below), the
unconditional bond exempts the owner's property from liens, whether or
not the owner has paid the contractor.41 The governing statute requires
that a lienor with actual or constructive notice of the existence of
the bond sue on the bond instead of on a lien.42 To exempt the property
from liens, the unconditional private payment bond must be attached to
the notice of commencement at the time of its recording.43 If the bond
is not attached to the notice of commencement when it is recorded, the
owner/contractor can subsequently transfer liens to the bond.44
To perfect a claim against an unconditional private payment bond, a
lienor who is not in contractual privity with the general contractor
(i.e ., typically a material supplier or sub-subcontractor) must serve
a notice to contractor on the general contractor before beginning, or
within 45 days from the first day the lienor begins to furnish labor,
materials, or supplies to the job.45 On the other hand, if a notice of
commencement is not recorded, the bond is not attached when the notice
is recorded, or a reference to the bond is not given in the notice, the
lienor shall have 45 days from the date it is first notified of the
bond's existence within which to serve the notice to contractor.46
In any case, if the lienor not in privity with the contractor is not
otherwise notified in writing of the existence of the bond, the 45 days
to serve the notice to contractor begin to run from the date the lienor
first becomes aware of the existence of the bond.47 The notice to
contractor serves to put the contractor on notice that the lienor will
be looking to the payment bond for protection.48 The notice to
contractor must be in substantially the same form as provided within
�713.23(1)(c).
Additionally, as a condition precedent to recovery against an
unconditional �713.23 payment bond (whether or not it was recorded
with the notice of commencement), the lienor (inclusive of those in
privity with the general contractor and those who are not) must serve
the contractor and the surety with a notice of nonpayment not later
than 90 days after the final furnishing of materials, labor, or work on
the project.49 This notice perfects the lienor's claim against the bond
for all payments due referenced in the notice and all subsequent
payments that become due.50 The notice of nonpayment must be in
substantially the same form as that provided by the statute.51 Serving
a notice of nonpayment that does not adhere to the statutory form can
negate an otherwise proper claim against the bond.52
A lienor not in privity with the general contractor cannot maintain an
action for labor, materials, or supplies against the general contractor
or the surety unless it first serves the notice to contractor and the
notice of nonpayment.53 Likewise, the claim against the bond by a
lienor in privity with the general contractor is barred if it does not
timely serve the surety and the contractor with the requisite notice of
nonpayment.54
All lienors must commence an action against the unconditional payment
bond within "one year from the performance of the labor or completion
of delivery of the materials and supplies."55 Similar to the analysis
for the timing of an action on a claim of lien, the time period for
bringing an action against the surety on the bond shall be calculated
from the actual last day of furnishing labor and materials and not "by
other standards, such as the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or
the issuance of a certificate of substantial performance."56 Finally,
similar to the notice of contest of lien, the contractor or its agent
can also shorten the time limit for initiating an action against the
bond from one year to 60 days by recording and serving a notice of
contest of claim against payment bond.57
Conditional Payment Bonds��713.245
A private owner concerned about clouds on title can also exempt
property from the recording of liens by requiring that its contractor
obtain a conditional payment bond.58 The conditional payment bond is a
hybrid: In some instances, it will exempt the owner's property from
liens and in others it will not. Generally, if the contractor's
obligation to pay lienors is expressly conditioned upon and limited to
the payments made by the owner to the contractor, the duty of the
surety to pay lienors under this bond will be co-extensive with the
contractor's duty to pay. This type of contractual provision is
commonly referred to as a "pay when paid" clause.59 When a lienor's
contract contains or incorporates "pay when paid" language and the
owner has not paid the contractor for a lienor's work, the lienor is
entitled to proceed against the property for payment pursuant to a
claim of lien instead of against the conditional payment bond.60
Alternatively, if the owner has paid the contractor, the conditional
payment bond protects the lienor in lieu of the property.61
Section 713.245 governs conditional payment bonds and sets forth
several requirements for such bonds. First, the bond must contain, in
at least 10-point type, the "pay when paid" clause set forth in
�713.245(1)(c).62 The notice of commencement must identify the
bond as conditional and the owner has to attach the bond to the notice
of commencement when it is recorded.63 Finally, the bond must contain
the words "conditional payment bond" "in the title . . . at the top of
the front page."64
On a project bonded by a �713.245 bond, lienors must act prudently
and timely to protect the right to get paid from the property. Thus,
where the bond otherwise complies with �713.245, regardless if the
underlying contract contains or incorporates "pay when paid" language,
the statute requires the lienor to perfect its right to a claim of
lien.65 Accordingly, lienors faced with a purported �713.245 bond
should timely serve their notice to owner within 45 days of beginning
their work and record their claim of lien within 90 days of completion
of the work, even though the �713.245 bond is attached to the
recorded notice of commencement. This point cannot be overemphasized.
Then, notwithstanding the existence of the conditional payment bond, if
the owner has not paid the contractor for that lienor's work, the
lienor can proceed with an action to foreclose its claim of lien
against the owner�but only if it has timely perfected and
properly recorded the lien.66
Just as important, lienors must also protect the right to get paid from
the bond. Florida case law implicitly requires that lienors faced with
a �713.245 bond perfect the right to recover against an
unconditional �713.23 bond. This is so because in North American
Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hughes Supply, 705 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA
1998), even though the bond complied with the statutory requirements of
�713.245, it was treated as an unconditional �713.23 bond as
to every lienor whose contract did not contain or incorporate "pay when
paid" language.67 In fact, in North American Specialty, the lienor that
failed to perfect the right to make a claim against the �713.23
bond was barred from recovery because its
failure to comply with mandatory notice requirements of
�713.23(1)(d) and (e), Florida Statutes, is not excused by its
faulty interpretation of �713.245, Florida Statutes, and its
assumption that it need not comply with the �713.23 notice
requirements.68
Alternatively, although the bond may purport to be conditional, if for
some reason it does not satisfy the requirements of �713.245, it
may also be treated as a �713.23 bond as to all of the potential
lienors on a job.
Accordingly, if the general contractor's contract with any lienor is
found not to contain or incorporate the necessary "pay when paid"
language, pursuant to North American Specialty the bond is likely to be
treated as an unconditional �713.23 bond as to that respective
lienor.69 Because �713.245 does not mandate the service of a
notice to contractor or a notice of nonpayment (i.e ., required to
perfect a claim against a �713.23 bond) as conditions precedent to
the perfection of the lienor's claim against the conditional payment
bond, the lienor's failure to satisfy the notice provisions of
�713.23 risks foregoing its bond claim entirely.70 Indeed, lienors
are not prejudiced in any way by perfecting their rights under
�713.23 against a bond that on its face satisfies �713.245
(conditional payment bond).
Where the bond is deemed a �713.245 bond as to a particular lienor
who has properly recorded a claim of lien and the owner has paid the
contractor for that lienor's work, the owner has 90 days to transfer
the lien to the conditional payment bond.71 The owner does so by
recording a notice of bond and a certificate of payment to the
contractor in the public records in similar fashion to the recording of
a claim of lien (see above).72
The notice of bond effectuates the transfer of the claim of lien to the
bond, and the certificate of payment certifies that the owner has paid
the contractor for that lienor's work, triggering the surety's
liability on the bond.73 If the owner waits more than 90 days to
transfer the lien to the �713.245 bond, the transfer is only
effective as to that lien if the contractor, owner, and surety sign the
notice of bond.74
If the lien is properly transferred to the conditional bond, the lienor
has one year from the transfer date to bring an action against the
surety on the bond.75 If the owner does not transfer the lien to the
conditional bond for whatever reason, the lienor must disregard the
existence of the bond and initiate an action to foreclose the lien
within one year from its recordation date.76 Lienors, however, do not
often know whether the owner has, in fact, paid the general contractor
for their particular work until the owner transfers the lien to the
bond and records the certificate of payment. It is imperative,
therefore, that in a �713.245 bond scenario the lienor always
perfect its right to a claim of lien and its rights against a
�713.23 bond, unless it is unequivocally clear that the bond will
be deemed conditional as to that lienor.
Finally, to the extent that the owner has partially paid the contractor
for a lienor's work, and the recorded certificate of payment reflects
this fact, the lienor can proceed with both a claim against the
�713.245 bond for the amount paid by the owner and to foreclose
its claim of lien for the amount unpaid.77 In this rare situation, the
lawsuit must be timely initiated to comply with the one-year lien
limitation period because the lien recordation date logically occurs
prior to the date of its partial transfer to the conditional payment
bond.
On a presumptively bonded job, a lienor's failure to perfect lien
rights due to the identification of a �713.245 bond in the notice
of commencement or otherwise is an easy way to avoid getting paid.
Likewise, misinterpretation of the nature of the bond due to the
contractual language involved and the consequent failure to perfect the
unconditional bond claim pursuant to �713.23 can also result in
nonpayment.
Instead, reference to the �713.245 bond in the notice of
commencement (or on the bond itself) should trigger careful
consideration of the relevant notice requirements, contractual
language, and bond documents to ensure that the right to get paid (from
either the conditional or unconditional bond and/or the property) is
not lost through failure to recognize the true nature of the bond in
question.
Transfer Bonds
Florida's construction lien law also provides for the transfer of a
claim of lien to a bond upon filing with the clerk of the court a bond
written "in an amount equal to the amount demanded in such claim of
lien, plus interest thereon at the legal rate for three years, plus
$1000 or 25 percent of the amount demanded in the claim of lien,
whichever is greater, to apply on any attorneys' fees and court costs
that may be taxed in any proceeding to enforce said lien."78 If the
lien is transferred to the bond before the lienor files suit, the
surety must be named in the suit. The one-year limitations period for
bringing an action on a claim of lien applies to an action against the
transfer bond.79
Florida Public Payment Bonds
There are no lien rights in Florida when work is performed on publicly
owned property. F.S. �255.05 (known as the "Little Miller Act" in
reference to the corresponding federal law, 40 U.S.C. �270a)
requires a person entering into a contract with the state or any
county, city, or other political subdivision or public authority in
excess of $100,000 for the repair or construction of a public facility
to provide a payment and performance bond.80 The requirement may be
waived by a local government for a contract in an amount of $200,000 or
less.81
A lienor on a public job has the right to look to a �255.05 public
payment bond for payment. The �255.05 notice provisions differ
only slightly from those under a private unconditional payment bond
(�713.23). Thus, a lienor in direct contract with a general
contractor need only file suit on the bond within one year of last
furnishing labor, services, or materials on the job.82 Lienors, such as
material suppliers, however, who are not in privity with the general
contractor, must first furnish the contractor with notice that they
will look to the bond for protection ("notice to contractor").83 This
notice must be served within 45 days of first furnishing work or
delivering materials to the job�similar to the notice to
contractor required by �713.23(1)(c).84 The sub-subcontractor or
supplier must also, within 90 days after the final furnishing of labor
services or materials to the project, serve the contractor and the
surety with a notice of nonpayment setting forth, among other things,
the amount of the claim, the public project on which the work was done,
and the name of the general contractor.85
An action by a lienor lacking privity with the contractor may not be
instituted against the general contractor and/or the surety unless both
notices are given.86 Finally, the action on the public payment bond
must be commenced within one year from the last date of performance or
delivery of materials.87 Attorneys' fees and costs are also recoverable
by the prevailing party.88
Conclusion
Perfecting lien and/or bond rights under Florida law is not that
difficult. The key to doing it correctly is making sure you and/or your
client act prudently and quickly right before or at the time
performance begins. Your client should certainly not wait until a pay
requisition goes unanswered before starting to wonder if he or she
possesses lien and/or bond rights. As discussed, the moment your client
begins to provide labor, services, or materials, its lien and/or bond
rights arise. Although perfecting a construction claim of lien will not
always ensure that the lienor will be paid, when the payment cycle on a
project breaks down, those lienors who perfected their lien and/or bond
rights will be paid first. Indeed, adhering to the statutory framework
is akin to having a guarantee for payment that is secured by the
owner's property or by a bond. By following the statutory requirements
to perfect lien and/or bond rights before they become an issue, instead
of wondering if you will be able to recover your brother's $15,000 loss
against a "dry well" general contractor, you will be able to return his
desperate phone call and tell him, "Here comes the money!" with
confidence.
1 See Fla. Stat. �713.02 and �713.06, (2001). Unless
otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the 2001 version of
�713.01 et al. and �255.05.
2 WMS Construction Inc. v. Palm Springs Mile Associates, Ltd., 762 So.
2d 973, 974-75 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 2000) (citations omitted).
3 See Fla. Stat. �713.23 and �713.245.
4 See id.
5 See Fla. Stat. �713.24.
6 See Fla. Stat. �255.05.
7 See id.
8 See Johnson v. Aqua Pool Co. Inc., 725 So. 2d 458, 459 (Fla. 2d
D.C.A. 1999).
9 Contractual privity is the relationship between two or more
contracting parties. See Barron's Law Dictionary 374 (3d ed. 1991).
10 See Fla. Stat. �713.06. This article does not address the lien
and/or bond rights of a party who is in privity with the owner. In most
cases, this party will be the general contractor. For a general
overview of this procedure, see �713.05.
11 See Fla. Stat. �713.06.
12 See Broward Atlantic Plumbing Co. v. R.L.P., Inc., 402 So. 2d 464,
466 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1981).
13 The notice to owner and other required notices under the Florida
Construction Lien Law must either be served certified or registered
mail return receipt requested or by actual delivery to the person to be
served. See Fla. Stat. �713.18.
14 Fla. Stat. �713.06(2)(a).
15 See Gulfside Properties Corp. v. Chapman Corp., 737 So. 2d 604, 607
(Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1999), rev. denied, 749 So. 2d 502 (1999).
16 Fla. Stat. �713.06(2)(a).
17 The notice of commencement is a document required by �713.13.
The notice of commencement must be recorded by the owner in the public
records of the county where the property sought to be improved is
located before construction begins and posted at the job site for all
to see. See Fla. Stat. �713.13(1)(a). In it, the owner sets forth
detailed information relating to the project that can be used for
recording liens and properly serving notices. See Fla. Stat.
�713.13(1)(a)�(f). If the project is bonded, the bond must
be attached to notice of commencement at recording. See Fla. Stat.
�713.13(1)(e). If the bond is not recorded, it can later be used
as a transfer bond pursuant to �713.24. See id. See also infra,
section on transfer bonds and �713.24.
18 The notice to owner must still be served even if the owner is
actually aware of the lienor's presence on the job. See Tompkins Land
Co., Inc. v. Edge , 341 So. 2d 206, 208 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1976) (advice
to subcontractor by owner that fire hydrant was in the wrong place was
not evidence of notice under the lien statute).
19 See Fla. Stat. �713.08(5).
20 "Substantial completion" within the meaning of a construction
contract has been defined to be the time when "the owner begins to
utilize the work for its intended purpose." See J.M. Beeson Co. v.
Sartori, 553 So. 2d 180, 182 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1989).
21 Aronson v. Keating, 386 So. 2d 822, 823 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1980).
22 See Fla. Stat. �713.08(5).
23 Cf. Lofter v. Rashide , 523 So. 2d 1230, 1230-31 (Fla. 3d D.C.A.
1988) (claim of lien invalid because it incorrectly described the
materials that were furnished by the lienor).
24 Fla. Stat. �713.08(4)(c).
25 See, e.g., Fla. Stat. �713.08(4)(c).
26 See Fla. Stat. �713.22.
27 See Fla. Stat. �713.22(1).
28 See Fla. Stat. �713.29.
29 See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co. , 474 So. 2d 212, 214
(Fla. 1985) (prejudgment interest is another element of pecuniary
damages and once a verdict has liquidated damages as of a certain date,
computation of prejudgment interest is merely a mathematical
computation).
30 See Fla. Stat. �713.22(2).
31 See id.
32 See Dykema v. Trans State Industries, Inc., 303 So. 2d 52, 53 (Fla.
2d D.C.A. 1974); Jack Stilson ~Co. v. Caloosa Bayview Corp., 265 So. 2d
85 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1972), affd., 278 So. 2d 282, 283 (Fla. 1973).
33 See Fla. Stat. �713.31.
34 See id.
35 See Fla. Stat. �713.31(2).
36 The "good faith" exception to the fraudulent lien statute was
enacted to prevent inhibiting those involved in a good faith dispute
over monies owed from exercising their right to file a protective lien.
See, e.g., Delta Painting, Inc. v. Baumann, 710 So. 2d 663, 666 (Fla.
3d D.C.A. 1998) (Cope, J., dissenting). See also William Dorsky Assoc.,
Inc. v. Highlands County Title ~Guaranty Land Co., 528 So. 2d 411, 412
(Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1988) (recognizing that liens filed in good faith
preclude an award of punitive damages); Vinci Development Co. v.
Connell, 509 So. 2d 1128, 1133 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1987) (same).
37 See Fla. Stat. �713.20.
38 See id.
39 The owner can also institute an action to discharge the lien. See
Fla. Stat. �713.21(4). Further, an owner eager to remove the lien
can transfer it to a bond. See Fla. Stat. �713.24.
40 See Fla. Stat. �713.23.
41 See Fla. Stat. �713.02(6).
42 See Fla. Stat. �713.23.
43 See Fla. Stat. �713.13(1)(e).
44 See Fla. Stat. �713.23(2). A lienor may also demand a copy of a
payment bond, if any, from the owner, contractor, or surety at any
time. See Fla. Stat. �713.23(1)(b).
45 See Fla. Stat. �713.23(1)(c).
46 See id.
47 See id.
48 See id.
49 See Fla. Stat. �713.23(d).
50 See id.
51 See id.
52 See Midtown Enterprises, Inc. v. Local Contractors, Inc., 750 So. 2d
683, 685 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1999), reh'g. denied, (2000).
53 See Fla. Stat. �713.23(1)(e).
54 See Fla. Stat. �713.23(1)(d).
55 Fla. Stat. �713.23(1)(e).
56 Id.
57 See id.
58 See Fla. Stat. �713.245.
59 See North American Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hughes Supply, Inc., 705
So. 2d 616, 618 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1998).
60 See generally Fla. Stat. �713.245.
61 See id.
62 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(1)(c).
63 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(1)(a).
64 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(1)(b).
65 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(4).
66 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(3).
67 See North American Specialty, 705 So. 2d at 617.
68 See id. at 618.
69 See id. at 617.
70 See id.
71 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(4).
72 See id.
73 See id.
74 See id.
75 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(2).
76 See Fla. Stat. �713.22(1).
77 See Fla. Stat. �713.245(10).
78 Fla. Stat. �713.24(1)(b).
79 See Fla. Stat. �713.24(4).
80 See Fla. Stat. �255.05(1)(a).
81 See id.
82 See Fla. Stat. �255.05(2)(a)2.
83 See id.
84 See id.
85 See id.
86 See id.
87 See id.
88 See id.
Daniel R. Vega is an associate with the Miami office of Carlton Fields
where he practices construction and commercial litigation. He obtained
his J.D., cum laude , from the Florida State University College of Law
in 1998. The author acknowledges the assistance of Bruce King, Patricia
Thompson, and Maria C. McGuinness on this article.