BACKGROUND - Local governments and some nonprofit consortia have received funding from HUD's Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP). The funds can be used to acquire foreclosed upon residential properties and vacant land for the purpose of creating affordable housing opportunities.Under the program it is very difficult to make funds
directly available to individuals wishing to purchase homes because the
NSP requirements are so daunting. With regard to acquiring
foreclosed multifamily apartments it is difficult to find developers
willing to participate because of the inherent economic constraints
(rents are required to be kept low) and the complicated NSP regulatory
requirements. Unfortunately, the local government NSP administrators who design
these programs typically have
never been developers and, therefore, lack the developer's perspective.
Some administrators have an aversion to partnering with
experienced nonprofits and therefore end up designing their programs in isolation. For
these reasons local NSP programs can end up being needlessly bureaucratic and not developer
friendly. The results
have been predictable -
Part One: Homeownership
Overview - the need to build in market
based incentives: Local NSP
programs should work collaboratively with nonprofit developers. To the
extent
feasible, market based incentives should be built into the single
family homeownership program. The program should be designed to
mimic as much as possible the way normal market driven
deals are done (while fully complying
with all NSP regulatory
requirements).
Refresher - How a Bank Might Provide
an
Unsubsidized Line of Credit
(for acquisition, rehabilitation and
resale of single family homes). Here is an outline of how it is
typically done. Later in this paper we will explore how such concepts
can be applied to NSP.
- The developer submits a loan application (with all required
supporting documentation).
- The bank issues a commitment letter
- Disbursements are periodically made for acquisition and
rehabilitation
- To obtain a disbursement the borrower submits a packet
with the required documentation.
- The lender takes a mortgage on each property.
- The mortgage is released upon the resale of each house
(provided ALL of the lender's requirements have been satisfied).
Blueprint for an NSP Single Family Program
Summary:
Provide an NSP funded line of credit to nonprofit developers to
acquire and rehabilitate properties. The
program would be modeled to the extent possible on how a private sector
lender might make an unsubsidized line of credit available
(factoring in full compliance with all NSP regulations). When
needed to make the unit affordable, a portion of the funding might be
"rolled over" to provide soft second purchase loans.
Overview of the Key Concept:
Prior to negotiating any purchase contracts the developer applies for
revolving line of credit loan with the NSP funder. A loan agreement is
entered into and the developers then begins to seek out properties.
Upon execution of a puruchase contract the developer submits a
disbursement request to the NSP funder accompanied by all required
documentation. The request is then expeditiously approved (or
dissapproved) followed by a closing on the acquisition
Loan Application Process. Through an RFQ of RFP nonprofit developers would be invited to submit applications for the
line of credit. The application procedure would require the developer
to submit specified documentation. Thus, the NSP
lender gets to select a pool of pre-qualified developers with which it
will do business. At this stage, no
documentation would be required about particular properties (that
information would be submitted later as part of a
disbursement request).
Loan Agreements
would
be executed with the nonprofit developers selected during the
application process. The Agreements would specify all of the
requirements that had to be
met in order for NSP funds to be disbursed.
Disbursements for Acquisition and
Rehabilitation. The developer, after executing the Loan
Commitment Agreement, would seek out eligible properties for purchase.
A disbursement request for a particular property would be submitted to
the NSP lender. The disbursement request would contain all of
the
documentation required by the Loan Commitment Agreement including:
- title insurance commitment
- executed purchase contract
- appraisal (showing that the purchase price meets NSP
requirements)
- rehabilitation budget
- environmental compliance documentation
- proof that property is in an NSP qualified neighborhood
- other documents reasonably required
"Closing
Documents" for Acquisition Disbursements:
1. Loan Agreement
2. Promissory Note
3. Environmental Compliance Agreement
4. Mortgage
- The mortgage would be released upon resale only if the buyer
had first been approved by the NSP lender. The following
documentation would need to be submitted for such approval:
- Satisfactory proof of the buyer's income
- Certificate of Completion from approved home buyer
education program
- Other documentation reasonably required by the NSP lender
These would be standardized closing
documents
that could be quickly adapted for each acquisition. Provided that
all of the lender's requirements had been met, the closing would
take place within 14 days after a disbursement package had
been submitted.
Meeting
the Affordability Requirements
"Recapture"
vs "Resale": The regulations governing NSP require compliance
with the HOME affordability guidelines.
The regulations governing the
HOME program allow (but do not require) heavy handed "resale"
restrictions, imposed by a recorded covenant, wherein
buyers are restricted as to who they can re-sell their homes to and the
price that they could ask. An alternative (and less
intrusive) "recapture" method is also authorized wherein the subsidy,
under specified
circumstances, is recaptured when the property is resold or improperly
leased.
Local NSP programs should comply by
using "recapture" mechanisms and not "resale" restrictions.
The
primary objective of NSP, after all, is to stabilize neighborhoods that
are in a downward spiral. It makes little sense to impose low resale
prices in areas
where prices are already in steep decline.
Below is an outline of how the recapture mechanism could work:
- In cases where a buyer can obtain affordable conventional
financing
there is no need for a formal recapture mechanism. The reason? At
closing the
subsidy is
naturally "recaptured" when the buyer pays the purchase price and the
developer returns the full amount of the subsidy to the NSP lender in
return for a release of the acquisition/rehab Mortgage
- Purchase Loans for
Buyers:
In cases where the buyer can not obtain
affordable conventional financing, a portion of the developer's NSP
acquisition/rehab loan could be "rolled over" and made available to the
buyer for a portion of the purchase price. This would be accomplished
by a means of "soft second" Promissory Note (secured by a Mortgage)
payable to the NSP lender. The Note could be made forgivable at the
conclusion of the specified affordability period. This
mechanism is expressly authorized by the HOME affordability regulations.
- Technically speaking, the NSP lender is making a purchase
loan to the
buyer but there would be no cash transferred at the closing. As
the
buyer signs the soft second Note and Mortgage with the NSP
lender the developer is given a credit by that same lender against the
amount owed on the acquisition/rehab loan.
- The "soft second" Note would not require amortization (no
monthly
payments). Payment would be due only if the house were re-sold or
improperly
leased during a prescribed affordability period.
- The closing documents for the "soft second" loan for the
buyer are as
follows:
- Lender-borrower-agreement
- Soft Second Note
- Soft Second Mortgage
Part Two: Rental - (back to the top)
Background: The NSP
regulations require that 25% of the funds be used to serve families
with incomes below 50% of the area median. Because it is so
difficult to provide homeownership opportunities for such persons most
local NSP programs earmark a portion of their funds for rental housing.
Recommendation - Use A Portion of NSP Funds Designated for Rental House to Work with Single Family
Structures
. Because the federal regulations are so
difficult to comply with and because of basic issues of economic
feasibility, it is very difficult to use NSP funds to acquire and
rehabilitate foreclosed multifamily apartment buildings. For this
reason, it is recommended
that local NSP programs look to use a portion of their NSP funds to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed single family structures as a component of their rental housing strategies. (Doing this would not rule out the use of NSP funds for multifamily buildings where such use was objectively feasible).
The Difficulty of Using NSP for
Multifamily Buildings
- The high cost of rehabilitation
Such buildings are typically old and
deteriorated. There may not be sufficient funds to pay for the
cost. Rehabilitation is expensive and the available NSP funds
probably will not be sufficient in and of themselves.
- Low amounts of net cash flow
Rents are required to be kept low due
to the NSP requirements for serving people with incomes at less than
50% of the area's median income. Because of this, there is little
income to service debt on loans needed to pay for the rehabilitation
work. Beyond that, even if the cash flow was sufficient banks may
still be reluctant to make loans for such ventures
- Uniform Relocation Act compliance
Generally, this statute requires
developers to pay the cost of relocating persons displaced in projects
that use federal funds. The developer acquiring the property must
be able to document that all tenants in occupancy as of the date that
the purchase contract was signed received the notice that is required
by the statute. Learning the identity of those tenants can be tricking
in a building that has undergone foreclosure. The budget for a project
(already tight due to the limited amount of rental income that will be
generated) must
include relocation expenses necessitated by this law. Feasible
acquisitions might be limited to those that are already vacant or those
having enough vacant units
available so that tenants could be moved around during the rehab
process.
- Tenants in Foreclosure Act compliance
This recent law gives tenants living in
foreclosed properties
new rights. Locally administered NSP programs,
in approving an acquisition of a foreclosed multifamily building, will
prudently require documentation showing the identity of the tenants in
occupancy as of the date of the foreclosure
sale and proof that the required notices had been given to them
- Davis Bacon Act compliance
Because NSP is federal money, labors
costs for the rehabilitation of projects involving more than 11 units
will be increased (wages must be paid at the "prevailing" rate pursuant
to the requirements of the
Davis
Bacon Act)
- Required installation
of "Green" Components,
Though not necessarily required by the
federal NSP regulations or the relevant building codes, local NSP
programs will sometimes add cost to a project's budget by requiring the
inclusion of mandatory "green" energy saving features. This puts
an additional strain on already tight rehab budgets (given the limited
amount NSP funds available and the limited amount of cash flow
available to pay debt service)
- Environmental
compliance.
Under federal regulations, if the rehab
costs exceed 75% of the acquisition costs the project is considered
"new construction" requiring costly and time consuming environmental
clearance procedures involving United States HUD. Note: these
federal regulations offer a disincentive to developers to try and
bargain for a low acquisition price.
- Compliance with "Section 3" of the Federal Housing Act
Because federal funds are involved,
contractors doing the rehab are required to hire local
residents (
click here
for more information). The requirement is typically enforced by
requiring the
contractors to sign a "First Source Hiring Agreement".
The Bottom Line: Most
developers will find it very difficult (if not impossible) to successfully use NSP funds
to acquire and rehabilitate foreclosed multifamily apartment buildings.
Advantages to Using Single Family
Structures
- Acquiring and rehabilitating a single family structure involves
much less money than would be needed for large multifamily structures.
- The rehabilitation work required for a single family structure is
on a much smaller scale than the work needed for a large multifamily
building. Accordingly, the work would be completed much more quickly
and with fewer headaches.
- Such a strategy would increase the housing options available for
larger families. Most apartment buildings don't offer units with
enough bedrooms for larger families. Because of this local Section 8
programs have a hard time placing larger families. The obvious solution
is to make single family structures available for rent. Because
of the high likelihood that voucher holders would be attracted as
tenants these types of ventures would enjoy a greater degree of
economic viability.
- Such projects would be exempt from the Davis Bacon Act (thus
lowering the cost of the rehabilitation work)
- In most cases there would be no need to comply with the Uniform
Relocation Act.
- Compliance with the Tenants in Foreclosure Act would be much
simpler.
Implementation of a Single Family
Rental Program
- To pay for the cost of acquisition and rehabilitation it is
proposed that the local NSP program provide developers with a
line of credit similar to that proposed for the homeownership program
(see above).
- NSP disbursements to the developer would be secured by mortgages
on the properties acquired.
- Repayment requirements would be geared to the amount of net
rental income to be generated by each property taking into account
operating expenses (such as insurance, management fees, reserves, etc.)
and a reasonable economic return for the developer. Provision
should be made for periodic adjustments to the repayment schedule in
the event of unusual increases in expenses.